Skip to main content

Table 3 Satisfaction survey results

From: Clinical observation of the regeneration process of defects after breast cancer resection

  Patient Excellent Good Fair Poor
Surgeon     
Traditional breast conserving surgery
(n = 41)
Excellent 12 2
Good 2 4
Fair 2 5 3
Poor 5 6
Oxidized regenerated cellulose
(n = 41)
Excellent 18 3
Good 7 5
Fair 3
Poor 1 4
Gelatin sponge
(n = 43)
Excellent 15 8
Good 8 3
Fair 1 2 1
Poor 2 3
  1. TBCS, traditional breast conserving surgery; ORC, oxidized regenerated cellulose; GS, gelatin sponge
  2. Satisfaction analysis: TBCS VS ORC (P = 0.024); TBCS VS GS (P = 0.038); ORC VS GS (P = 0.973) (Evaluation by surgeons). TBCS VS ORC (P = 0.005); TBCS VS GS (P = 0.014); ORC VS GS (P = 0.73) (Evaluation by patients)