Table 6 Participants’ reports on the EQ VAS according to their SES n = 66
EQ VAS score (n) | Economic Status | P† | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low 33 (%) | Middle 20 (%) | High 9 (%) | Don’t know 4 (%) | Total | ||
10 | – | – | – | – | 0 | .002* |
20 | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
30 | 5 (15.2%) | 3 (15.0%) | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (50.0%) | 11 | |
40 | 7 (21.2%) | – | 0 | 1 (25.0%) | 8 | |
50 | 8 (24.3%) | 6 (30.0%) | 1 (11.1%) | – | 15 | |
60 | 5 (15.2%) | 4 (20.0%) | 0 | 1 (25.0%) | 10 | |
70 | 3 (9.1%) | 3 (15.0%) | 0 | – | 6 | |
80 | 3 (9.1%) | 4 (20.0%) | 2 (22.2%) | – | 9 | |
90 | 2 (6.1%) | 0 | 5 (55.6%) | – | 7 | |
100 | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
Mean (± SD) VAS | 53.33 ± 17.619 | 58.00 ± 16.416 | 76.67 ± 21.794 | 40.00 ± 14.142 | 57.12 ± 19.436 | |
Median | 50 | 60 | 90 | 35 | 50 | |