Table 4 Impact of CHARISMA on ring disclosure and IPV among select subgroups
Population subgroup | Measure | n (%) |
|---|---|---|
Participants who disclosed ring use to partner after enrollment (n = 12) | Helpfulness of CHARISMA in talking to partner about ring use | |
Very helpful | 7 (58) | |
Somewhat helpful | 2 (17) | |
Made no difference | 3 (25) | |
Participants who had not disclosed ring use to partner at time of interview (n = 23) | Helpfulness of CHARISMA in helping participant feel comfortable keeping ring use a secret from partner | |
Very helpful | 15 (65) | |
Somewhat helpful | 4 (17) | |
Made no difference | 4 (17) | |
Participants whose partner was controlling or abusive at enrollment (n = 13) | Status of relationship at time of interview | |
No longer with that partner | 3 (23) | |
Still with that partner, but he is no longer controlling or abusive | 7 (54) | |
Still with that partner and he is still controlling or abusive, but have some strategies and information that make me feel safer than before | 1 (8) | |
Relationship has not changed | 2 (15) | |
Participants whose relationship was controlling or abusive at enrollment and whose relationship status had changed at time of interview (n = 11) | How much of an effect CHARISMA had in bringing about that change in the relationship | |
A big effect | 8 (73) | |
A medium effect | 2 (18) | |
A small effect | 0 (0) | |
No effect | 1 (9) |