Skip to main content

Table 3 Details of included studies

From: Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review

References; Country

Study design; graded Risk of Bias

Sample size; population details

Average age (SD)

Type of screening

Barriers

Facilitators

Abotchie and Shokar [20]; Ghana

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

157 university students

NR (age range 20–35, most between 21 and 25)

Pap smear

Low knowledge, low awareness, concern regarding partner disapproval, cost, time constraints, embarrassment, perceived not susceptible, fear of virginity loss

Knowledge of benefits of screening, perception of severity of disease

Agboeze et al. [21]; Nigeria (Abstract only)

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

234 female students

22 (SD 3)

Pap smear

Low awareness, low accessibility, fear of cancer diagnosis

NR

Akujobi et al. [22]; Nigeria (Abstract only)

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

220 third and fourth year female science students

23.8 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Lack of knowledge, lack of awareness about importance of screening, lack of awareness about where services are attainable

NR

Al-Naggar et al. [23]; Malaysia

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

287 female university students

20.9 (SD 1.89)

Pap smear

Fear of intimate nature of examination, HCP did not recommend/educate, lack of awareness of screening sites, cost, fear of virginity loss, embarrassment, fear of pain and discomfort

NR

Al-Shaikh et al. [24]; Saudi Arabia

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

1400 students studying health fields

20.4 (SD 1.3)

Pap smear

Lack of awareness, perception of low sensitivity of test, misconception of serious complications of test

NR

Albuquerque et al. [25]; Brazil

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

493 women,, young women (< 20) n = 64

35.4 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Low knowledge and awareness

NR

Alwahaibi et al. [26]; Oman

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

494: 204 patients, 133 staff, 157 students

NR (students all age 20–30)

Pap smear

Low knowledge, lack of awareness, physician gender, uncertainty of reliability of Pap smears

Belief of test allowing successful prevention and treatment for cancer

Annan et al. [27]; Ghana

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

200 female university students

20.4 (SD 1.96)

Unspecified

NR

Cervical cancer knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived deadliness, perceived benefits of screening

Ayinde et al. [28]; Nigeria

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

421 undergraduate students

23.6 (SD 3.6)

Pap smear

Lack of awareness

Increased knowledge and awareness

Bigaard et al. [29]; Denmark (Abstract only)

Qualitative focus groups (cross-sectional); medium risk

Sample size not reported in abstract; HPV vaccinated women

NR (age range 23–29)

Pap smear

Lack of knowledge, perceived not susceptible (test not relevant to them)

NR

Binka et al. [30]; Ghana

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

410 female students

NR (83% < 29 years; 17% > 30)

Unspecified

Lack of awareness

NR

Black et al. [31]; Canada

Cross-sectional focus groups; medium risk

80 women

NR (98% between age 20 and 29)

Pap smear

Discontinuity of care from HCP after moving away for work/school, difficulty finding female HCP, fear of discomfort and invasiveness of test, lack of awareness, lack of time

Reminders, email from HCP, linking testing to renewal appointment for oral contraceptives, assistance with finding HCP, longitudinal relationship with HCP or clinic, education, testing by female HCP, increased convenience (e.g. clinic on campus)

Blomberg et al. [32]; Sweden

Cross-sectional focus groups; medium risk

138 women from Stockholm cervical cancer screening registry

30 (SD 0)

Pap smear

Fear of pain and discomfort

Letter of invitation, flexibility in timing and location, choice of HCP, having test done with other exams, social marketing on importance of screening, cost-free testing

Blomberg et al. [33]; Sweden

Cross-sectional focus groups; medium risk

38 women from Cervical Cancer Screening administrative registry

30 (SD 0)

Pap smear

Lack of knowledge, lack of awareness, perceived not susceptible

Existing relationship with clinic

Byrd et al. [34]; United States

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

200 women

21 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Embarrassment, pain, embarrassment, fear of virginity loss, lack of awareness of where to be tested, fear of partner disapproval, misconception (only women who have had babies) need to be tested, fear of testing perceived as sexual activity

NR

Duffet-Leger et al. [35]; Canada

Cross-sectional survey; medium risk

1041 university students

20.7 (SD 1.77)

Pap smear

NR

Beliefs/behaviours of friends and family, sense of empowerment about getting Pap test

Head and Cohen [36]; United States

Cross-sectional individual and group interviews; medium risk

19 women

NR (median age of 20)

Pap smear

Negative past experiences, limited choice in HCP, fear of parental disapproval, cost, low accessibility, lack of privacy in small community (e.g. running into someone they know at the clinic)

Encouragement/support from mother

Hobbs [37]; United States (Abstract only)

Qualitative focus groups; medium risk

15 sexually active adolescents

18.7 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Lack of knowledge, fear of pain, embarrassment, fear of result, fear of unknown, perceived invincibility, HCP characteristics, fear of parents finding out, cost, lack of time, transportation

Education, trusting relationship with HCP, HCPs able to communicate well and put patients at ease, assured confidentiality, school programs, shorter wait times, telephone/email reminders, provision of babysitting or transportation, expanded clinic hours, having someone answer the phone when patients book appointments

Hoque [38], South Africa

Questionnaire; medium risk

169 full-time undergraduate students

20.81 (SD 1.7)

Pap smear

Low knowledge, fear of procedure, not currently experiencing symptoms

NR

Hoque [39], South Africa (Abstract only)

Questionnaire; medium risk

440 university students

20.39 (SD 1.71)

Pap smear

Low knowledge

High self-efficacy

Jayasinghe [40], Australia

Online survey; medium risk

149 women

23.2 (SD 2.1)

HPV DNA testing

Repetitive screening frequency

Public perceptions, national guidelines, gynecologist beliefs

Jubelirer [41]; United States

Questionnaire; medium risk

279 tenth-grade girls

15.3 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Embarrassment, pain, fear of cancer, confidentiality, cost

NR

Kahn [42], United States

Semi-structured interview; medium risk

15 adolescents

18.7 (SD 1.9)

Pap smear

Pain, embarrassment, fear of cancer, denial, poor HCP relationship, low knowledge, misinformation

Education, better HCP relationships, telephone and written reminders

Kahn [28], United States

Questionnaire; medium risk

490 adolescents and young girls at pap smear follow-up clinics

18.2 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Pain, inconsistent HCP, embarrassment, lack of HFP communication, lack of time, lack of transportation

Reminders, perceived control, perceived susceptibility

Kaneko [43], Japan

Online survey; medium risk

700 unmarried women

26.0 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Male physician

Free coupon for screening, perceived susceptibility

Kim [44], Korea (Abstract only)

Questionnaire; medium risk

303 unmarried female university students

22.4 (SD 2.0)

Pap smear

Low knowledge/awareness

NR

Kim [45], Korea (Abstract only)

Online questionnaire; medium risk

124 unmarried university students

NR

Pap smear

Unsure of effectiveness, low awareness

Subjective norm

Langille [46], Canada

Questionnaire; medium risk

1090 high school adolescents

16.6 (SD 0.1)

Pap smear

Lack of discussion with HCP, no physician, rural area

Education from HCP

Lee [47], United States

Focus group; medium risk

16 young Korean immigrant women

26 (SD NR)

Pap smear

Low knowledge, culture-specific barriers, low accessibility to healthcare, embarrassment, fear of virginity loss, stigma around visiting gynecologist clinic, language barriers, low health literacy

NR

Lorenzi [39],Brazil

Survey; medium risk

33 women with abnormal pap smears

NR (aged < 29)

Self-sampling

Embarrassment, pain

Easy to use, easy to understand, practicality

Najem [48], United States

Survey; medium risk

3343 inner city high school girls

NR (aged 13 and up)

Pap smear

HCP did not recommend, lack of awareness, cost, unaware of location, perceived not susceptible, time constraints, believed test was not accurate, embarrassment, time constraint

Family role models

Ogbonna [49], United Kingdom

Survey; medium risk

186 UK university students from Sub-Saharan Africa

NR (majority between age 18 and 24)

Pap smear

Low knowledge, misconceptions (such as around circumcision), cultural barriers, stigma

Perception of deadliness

Okoeki [50], United Kingdom

Semi-structured interviews, focus group; medium risk

24 young women

NR (age range 25–34)

Pap smear

Low awareness, embarassment, anxiety, association with sex, intimate, cultural barriers, fear of cancer, invasiveness

Education on sensitivity, education, alternative screening methods (self-sampling)

Oshima [51], Japan

Focus group; medium risk

15 university students

NR (age 20–22)

Pap smear

Lack of knowledge,misconceptions, lack of motivation, reluctance to visit gynecologist (embarrassment, stigma, invasiveness)

Media information, norms of family and friends, diagnosis within their family, education

Pan [52], China

Survey; medium risk

1878 medical students

20.8 (SD 1.3)

Unspecified

Side effects, inadequate information, low knowledge, stigma around premarital sex

High knowledge

Waller [53], United Kingdom

Interview, focus group; medium risk

27 young women

NR (age range between 25 and 34 for young women)

Unspecified

Lack of access to HCP (mobility, lack of consistency), fewer reminders, time constraints, lack of peer pressure, low perceived low perceptibility, menstrual cycle timing, low knowledge, pain, uncomfortable comments, apathy

Awareness, media coverage