Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate multinomial logistic regression analysis of the relationship between FGM/C types and POP

From: Female genital mutilation/cutting in sudan and subsequent pelvic floor dysfunction

  

Comparison between group 1 POP and group 2 POP

Comparison between group 1 POP and group 3 POP

Unadjusted OR

CI %95

P value

Unadjusted OR

CI %95

P value

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

FGM/C status

No FGM/C

0.476

0.173

1.308

0.150

0.171

0.058

0.511

0.002

 

FGM/C type 1

0.573

0.222

1.469

0.246

0.250

0.094

0.666

0.005

 

FGM/C type 2

0.588

0.316

1.094

0.094

0.216

0.115

0.406

0.0001

 

FGM/C type 3

1

   

1

   
  1. Statistically significant p values are numbered in italics and bolditalics
  2. POP: Pelvik organ prolapsus, FGM/C: Female genital mutilation/Cutting, The reference category is: Group 1