Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and Multivariable Logistic Regression (No screening/follow-up vs test/screening failure)a

From: Impact of prior underinsurance on cervical cancer screening among Davidson County, Tennessee, women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer, 2008–2018

 

No screening/follow-up (N = 116)

Test/screening failure (N = 35)

Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)

Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)a

History of underinsurance

 No

73 (63)

31 (89)

1.00 (ref.)

1.00 (ref.)

 Yes

43 (37)

4 (11)

4.57 (1.51–13.82)

4.26 (1.15–15.80)

Median age at diagnosis

52

35

1.04 (1.01–1.07)

1.03 (1.00–1.07)

[IQR]

[43–62]

[34–58]

Race/Ethnicity

 White, non-Hispanic

66 (58)

27 (77)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

 Non-white or Hispanic

48 (42)

8 (23)

2.47 (1.03–5.90)

2.73 (0.98–7.61)

FIGO stage

 I-IIA

58 (53)

25 (79)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

 IIB-IV

51 (45)

8 (21)

2.66 (1.11–6.41)

2.17 (0.82–5.78)

 Unknown/missing

3 (3)

2 (6)

Current/past smoker

 No/unknown

55 (47)

25 (71)

1.00 (ref.)

1.00 (ref.)

 Yes

61 (53)

10 (29)

2.77 (1.22–6.29)

4.07 (1.54–10.74)

Other barriersb

 None

72 (62)

26 (74)

1.00 (ref.)

1.00 (ref.)

 1 or more

44 (38)

9 (26)

1.76 (0.75–4.11)

1.48 (0.54–4.07)

Median year of diagnosis

[IQR]

2013

2013

1.01 (0.89–1.14)

1.00 (0.87–1.16)

[2011–2016]

[2010–2016]

  1. () Column percentages
  2. IQR interquartile range
  3. Boldface odds ratio value indicates statistical significance
  4. aAdjusted for age (as a continuous variable), race/ethnicity, smoking status, stage, presence of one or more barriers to screening other than underinsurance and year of cancer diagnosis (as a continuous variable)
  5. bAll other barriers to cervical cancer screening other than underinsurance