Skip to main content

Table 2 Participant characteristics (n = 36)a

From: Perceptions of pelvic floor dysfunction and rehabilitation care amongst women in southeast China after radical hysterectomy: a qualitative study

Variable

Value

Age, years

49 (42–58)

Educational levelb

 

 Junior secondary education (9 years)

12 (33.3)

 Senior secondary education (12–13 years)

12 (33.3)

 Higher education (15–19 years)

12 (33.3)

Place of residence

 

 Rural area

20 (55.6)

 Urban area

16 (44.4)

Occupation

 

 Farmer

9 (25.0)

 Chef

1 (2.8)

 Staff

4 (11.1)

 Teacher

5 (13.9)

 Trader

8 (22.2)

 Lawyer

2 (5.6)

 Freelance

4 (11.1)

 Retirement

3 (8.3)

Household income, yuan/month

 

  < 2,000

2 (5.6)

 2,000–5,000

16 (44.4)

 5,000–10,000

10 (27.8)

  > 10,000

8 (22.2)

Did PFD occur before surgery?

 

 Yes

7 (19.4)

 No

29 (80.6)

Did PFD occur after surgery?

 

 Yes

18 (50.0)

 No

18 (50.0)

Disease type

 

 Uterine sarcoma

2 (5.6)

 Ovarian cancer

11 (30.5)

 Endometrial cancer

11 (30.5)

 Cervical cancer

12 (33.4)

Surgical approach

 

 ORH

5 (13.9)

 LRH

31 (86.1)

Postoperative time, month

 

  ≤ 3 (acute postoperative period)

28 (77.8)

  > 3 ( postoperative follow-up period)

8 (22.2)

  1. PFD pelvic floor dysfunction; ORH open radical hysterectomy; LRH laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
  2. aValues are given as mean (range) or number (percentage)
  3. bClassified according to the education statistic data in 2018[14]