Author, year and country | Study design | Sample | UI type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n Assigned PFMT | Age M ± SD, (age range) | Condition | n, Comparators | Urge | Stress | Mixed | ||
Mechanism 1. Enhanced PFM strength | ||||||||
Bø (2003), Norway | Secondary analysis of RCT | 52 | 45.5, (24–64) |  |  |  | X |  |
Burns et al. (1993), USA | RCT | 83 | 63.0 ± 6.0, 63.0 ± 5.0, (≥ 50) |  | 40 controls |  | X | X |
Dinc et al. (2009), Turkey | RCT | 35 | 26.05 ± 4.8, 27.7 ± 7.2 | 20th-34th week of pregnancy | 33 controls |  | X | X |
Dougherty et al. (1993), USA | Pre and post-intervention study | 65 | 51.3 ± 10.6, (35–75) | Mid-age and elderly Parous |  |  | X |  |
Hahn et al. (1993), Sweden | Case-controlled study | 170 | 51.3 ± 0.98, (27–84) |  | 27 awaiting surgery |  | X |  |
Hung et al. (2012), Taiwan | Prospective cohort study | 68 | 50.5 ± 6.0 |  |  |  | X | X |
Kim et al. (2007), Japan | RCT, crossover follow up trial | 70 (35 in each group) | 76.6 ± 5.0, 76.6 ± 3.8 | Elderly |  |  | X |  |
Nystrom et al. (2018), Sweden | Pre and post-intervention study | 61 | 44.7 ± 9.7, (27–72) |  |  |  | X |  |
Segal et al. (2016), USA | Prospective cohort study | 215 | 54.4 ± 12.7 | Mid-age and elderly parous |  |  | X |  |
Sun et al. (2018), China | Prospective cohort study | 133 | 33.63 ± 3.98, 42.66 ± 11.35 | Postpartum |  |  | X |  |
Theofrastous et al. (2002), USA | RCT | 69 | 60.6 ± 10.0, (45–79) |  | 68, bladder training |  | X | X |
Mechanism 2. Maximized awareness of timing | ||||||||
Cammu et al. (2000)a, Belgium | 10-Year follow-up | 45 | 61.0 ± 10.0 |  |  |  | X |  |
Junginger et al. (2014), Germany | Prospective cohort study | 55 | Not reported | Â | Â | X | X | X |