Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant socio-demographic characteristics

From: What are the prospects for the hormonal IUD in the public sector? A mixed-method study of the user population in Zambia

 

Hormonal IUD

n = 153

Copper IUD

n = 168

Implant

n = 286

Injectable

n = 103

Age (%)

 16–24

34 (22.2)

16 (9.5)

124 (43.4)

40 (38.8)

 25–34

76 (49.7)

94 (55.9)

124 (43.4)

46 (44.7)

 35–49

43 (28.1)

58 (34.5)

38 (13.3)

17 (16.5)

 Mean age (SD)

30.1 (6.4)

32.3 (5.9)

26.7 (6.4)

27.6 (6.1)

Married (%)

115 (77.7)

146 (87.9)

211 (75.1)

77 (76.2)

Parity (%)

 0

10 (6.6)

4 (2.4)

21 (7.4)

2 (1.9)

 1–2

54 (35.6)

49 (29.9)

152 (53.4)

57 (55.4)

 3–4

63 (41.4)

73 (44.6)

81 (28.4)

33 (32.0)

 5+ 

25 (16.5)

38 (23.2)

31 (10.9)

11 (10.7)

 Mean number of children (SD)

3.0 (1.9)

3.4 (1.8)

2.4 (1.7)

2.5 (1.6)

Fertility intentions (%)

 Child in < 2 years/timing undecided

20 (13.1)

17 (10.1)

45 (15.8)

24 (23.3)

 Child in 2 + years

38 (25.0)

30 (17.9)

107 (37.7)

40 (38.8)

 No more children

45 (29.6)

55 (32.7)

44 (15.5)

17 (16.5)

 Undecided about more children

49 (32.2)

66 (39.3)

88 (31.0)

22 (21.4)

Highest education completed (%)

 No schooling or some primary

21 (13.8)

20 (11.7)

44 (15.4)

12 (11.7)

 Primary

55 (35.9)

65 (38.7)

136 (47.5)

54 (52.4)

 Secondary

58 (37.9)

65 (38.7)

87 (30.4)

34 (33.0)

 More than secondary

19 (12.4)

18 (10.7)

19 (6.6)

3 (2.9)

Urban wealth quintile (%)a

 Lowest

24 (15.7)

16 (9.6)

29 (10.2)

6 (5.9)

 Second

13 (8.5)

10 (6.0)

46 (16.3)

25 (24.5)

 Middle

28 (18.3)

32 (19.2)

78 (27.6)

29 (28.4)

 Fourth

36 (23.5)

40 (23.9)

78 (27.6)

25 (24.5)

 Highest

52 (34.0)

69 (41.3)

52 (18.4)

17 (16.7)

Full-time or self-employed (%)

62 (40.6)

47 (28.0)

58 (20.5)

27 (26.4)

  1. aRelative wealth was measured using the equity tool for Zambia [28]. The urban version of the equity tool compares participants to the urban population in Zambia