Skip to main content

Table 5 Component matrix with varimax rotation of the 26 items from the adapted SERVPERF questionnaire

From: Validation of a Spanish-language scale for evaluating perceived quality of care of medical abortions before 9 weeks gestation

Item

Factorial coefficients of the items after rotation

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

F7

p01

0.696

0.225

0.186

0.200

0.030

0.085

 − 0.074

p02

0.846

0.102

0.131

0.122

0.080

 − 0.016

0.015

p03

0.593

0.262

 − 0.106

0.418

0.096

 − 0.002

0.270

p04

0.832

0.138

0.093

0.086

0.018

 − 0.017

0.114

p05

0.758

0.225

0.119

0.107

 − 0.071

0.060

0.122

p06

0.572

0.155

0.448

0.292

 − 0.003

 − 0.016

 − 0.001

p07

0.584

0.247

0.257

0.255

 − 0.120

 − 0.015

0.092

p08

0.245

0.828

0.145

0.003

0.050

0.053

0.022

p09

0.135

0.838

0.194

0.139

0.048

0.094

 − 0.008

p10

0.262

0.715

0.153

0.254

 − 0.005

0.000

0.040

p11

0.302

0.283

0.036

0.617

0.172

 − 0.064

0.219

p12

0.329

0.460

0.337

0.086

0.020

 − 0.002

 − 0.062

p13

0.363

0.453

0.296

0.181

0.077

 − 0.108

0.228

p14

0.086

0.330

0.530

0.187

0.112

 − 0.014

0.187

p15

0.091

0.263

0.792

0.080

0.046

0.057

0.021

p16

0.254

0.109

0.722

0.083

0.006

0.100

0.191

p17

0.397

0.109

0.361

0.579

 − 0.018

0.054

 − 0.103

p18

0.263

0.202

0.255

0.659

0.077

0.146

 − 0.046

p19

 − 0.037

0.074

 − 0.048

0.195

0.101

0.785

0.046

p20

0.050

0.033

0.027

0.083

0.431

0.679

0.122

p21

0.010

 − 0.012

0.126

 − 0.133

 − 0.030

0.731

 − 0.040

p22

 − 0.010

0.042

0.076

0.152

0.879

0.010

 − 0.047

p23

0.029

0.042

0.041

 − 0.022

0.806

0.305

 − 0.024

p24

0.531

0.142

 − 0.092

 − 0.354

0.368

 − 0.158

0.161

p25

0.248

0.098

0.129

0.014

 − 0.105

0.017

0.780

p26

 − 0.018

 − 0.041

0.104

0.017

0.045

0.059

0.809

Eigenvalues

8.088

2.379

1.743

1.482

1.332

1.104

1.008

  1. Extraction method: Principal Component Analysis
  2. Rotation method: Varimax normalization. The Kaiser criterion was used with an Eigenvalue > 1 to determine the resulting factors and explained variance (65.9%). In each dimension, those items that presented a saturation value > 0.40. The saturation of elements grouped in each dimension is shown bold and italics with the exception the item P12 in f2 is shown the non-bold italics explained in the Questionnaire dimensions section