Skip to main content

Table 3 Pairwise comparisons for variables having significant differences between groups

From: Hysteroscopic management versus ultrasound-guided evacuation for women with first-trimester pregnancy loss, a randomised controlled trial

 

Blind evacuation (Group 1) versus ultrasound guided (Group 2)

Blind evacuation (Group 1) versus hysteroscopic guided (Group 3)

Ultrasound guided (Group 2) versus hysteroscopic guided (Group 3)

Operative time (minutes)

− 0.33 (− 1.19 to 0.52)a

− 5.54 (− 6.40 to − 4.69)a

− 5.21 (− 6.06 to − 4.36)a

NS

P < 0.001*

P < 0.001*

Total complications during or after operation

0.08 (− 0.01 to 0.16)b

0.11 (0.04 to 0.19)b

0.04 (− 0.02 to 0.09)b

NS

P = 0.005*

NS

Presence of remnants in ultrasound follow up

0.05 (0.01 to 0.09)b

0.05 (0.01 to 0.09)b

0

P = 0.030*

P = 0.030*

NA

Need for further treatment

0.05 (0.01 to 0.09)b

0.05 (0.01 to 0.09)b

0

P = 0.030*

P = 0.030*

NA

Conception rate within 2 years of follow up

− 0.16 (− 0.30 to − 0.01)b

− 0.25 (− 0.38 to − 0.12)b

− 0.10 (− 0.22 to 0.03)b

P = 0.035*

P < 0.001*

NS

Time to conceive (months)

1.57 (0.38 to 2.76)a

2.98 (1.86 to 4.09)a

1.40 (0.35 to 2.46)a

P = 0.006*

P < 0.001*

P = 0.006*

  1. NS not significant, NA not applicable
  2. *P value is significant
  3. aTukey pairwise comparisons of ANOVA test presented as differences in means (95% CI, confidence interval)
  4. bChi-square and Fisher pairwise comparisons for proportions presented as differences in proportions (95% CI)