Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of resilience, social support, coping styles, and corresponding norms (N = 431)

From: Perceived social support and coping style as mediators between resilience and health-related quality of life in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study

 

Score mean ± SD

Norm

MDa

95% CIb

P

Resilience

 

(N = 560)e

   

CD-RISCc total score

54.72 ± 14.71

65.4 ± 13.9

− 10.68

− 12.59, − 8.77

 < 0.001

Perceived social support

 

(N = 1589)f

   

MSPSSd total score

65.45 ± 9.40

68.91 ± 11.99

− 3.46

− 4.68, − 2.24

 < 0.001

Coping style

 

(N = 701)g

   

Confrontation

19.87 ± 3.73

19.48 ± 3.81

0.39

− 0.10, 0.87

0.12

Avoidance

16.70 ± 1.90

14.44 ± 2.97

2.25

2.01, 2.50

 < 0.001

Resignation

9.57 ± 2.87

8.81 ± 3.17

0.76

0.39, 1.13

 < 0.001

  1. aMean difference
  2. bConfidence interval
  3. cConnor–Davidson resilience scale
  4. dMultidimensional scale of perceived social support
  5. eAdapted from: Davidson JRT. Connor–Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) Manual. Unpublished. 08–19-2018, accessible at www.cd-risc.com
  6. fAdapted from: Jiang Q. Perceived social support scale. Chin J Behav Med Sci. 2001; 10(1): 41–43
  7. gAdapted from: Shen X, Jiang Q. Report on application of Chinese version of MCMQ in 701 patients. Chin J Behav Med Sci. 2009; 9(1):18–20