Inclusion criteria | Â |
---|---|
Population | Clinicians e.g., doctors, nurses and allied health professions involved in managing gynaecological cancers Adult female patients diagnosed with a gynaecological malignancy i.e., cervical, vulvar, vaginal, endometrial, or ovarian Caregivers and/or relatives of patients described above |
Intervention | Multimodal* interventions prior to surgery in isolation or in combination with an ERAS** intervention Qualitative studies exploring views and opinions of prehabilitation (uni/multimodal) amongst gynaecological cancer patients |
Comparator | Any intervention or usual care (within a randomised trial) |
Outcomes | The facilitators and enablers to engagement in prehabilitation The barriers to engagement and adherence with prehabilitation The intended and unintended outcomes of participating in prehabilitation The effectiveness of prehabilitation programmes |
Healthcare context | Any setting that provides care to adult cancer populations e.g., hospital, ambulatory care, outpatient/ community care, primary care, digital platforms |
Study design | Qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods studies. If relevant existing systematic reviews are identified, their primary papers will be included. Published up to and including September 2021 Protocols for ongoing trials of relevant prehabilitation interventions which meet the inclusion criteria |
Exclusion criteria | |
Population | Studies addressing tumour groups or sites other than those listed above in the inclusion criteria |
Intervention | Interventions focussing on single pre-operative interventions which are not part of a multimodal approach |
Study design | Social media posts, podcasts and blogs will be excluded |
Language | Articles published in a language other than English. Translation from other languages will not be possible due to lack of resources |