Skip to main content

Table 4 Relation between adherence DPI and RMR. Per. kg

From: The relationship between dietary phytochemical index and resting metabolic rate mediated by inflammatory factors in overweight and obese women: a cross-sectional study

 

RMR.per.kg

OR (95% CI)

β ± SE

P-value*

Crude model

Low adherence of DPI

1*

1

0.09

High adherence of DPI

1.41(0.94–2.11)

0.34 ± 0.20

Adjusted

Model 1

Low adherence of DPI

1

1

0.37

High adherence of DPI

1.27(0.74–2.18)

0.24 ± 0.27

Model 2

Low adherence of DPI

1

1

0.05

High adherence of DPI

2.77(0.98–7.82)

1.02 ± 0.52

  1. Bold: P value ≤ 0.05
  2. OR Odds ratio; CI Confidence interval, SE Standard error, DPI Dietary phytochemical index, RMR Resting metabolic rate
  3. Binary logistic regression; Crude model and adjusted models, Crude model; Unadjusted, model 1; Adjusted for age, WHR, energy intake, and physical activity, model 2; adjusted for all variables model 1 Plus all components of dietary intakes that were significant after adjustment, marital status, housing status, job, weight loss history in past years, number of family members, economic status, blood pressure and education
  4. *P ≤ 0/05 is significant, *Considered as reference; RMR.per.kg < 20 kcal/24 h/kg considered as reference group