Skip to main content

Table 4 Abortion knowledge and stigmatizing attitudes, beliefs, and actions by woreda, 2016 and 2019

From: Community-based intervention improves abortion knowledge and reduces abortion stigma among women in Oromia, Ethiopia: a quasi-experimental mixed methods evaluation

Abortion knowledge and SABAS

Fogera (Comparison)

p-value1

Boset (Intervention)

p-value1

2016 Baseline (n = 349)

2019 Endline (n = 430)

2016 Baseline (n = 351)

2019 Endline (n = 425)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Knowledge of one or more indications of legal abortion

105 (30)

245 (57)

***

75 (21)

361 (85)

***

 Pregnancy from rape/incest

52 (15)

142 (39)

***

58 (17)

253 (78)

***

 Risk to fetus

55 (16)

135 (37)

***

26 (7)

282 (75)

***

 Risk to mother

78 (22)

173 (48)

***

27 (8)

292 (78)

***

 Mother is < 18 years old

36 (10)

31 (9)

NS

45 (13)

151 (40)

***

 Mother is physically or mentally disabled

40 (11)

78 (22)

***

14 (4)

166 (44)

***

Total SABAS Score2

 Mean (SD)

49.7 (10)

55 (9)

***

48.7 (10)

39.4 (15)

***

 Median

48

55

 

50

39

 

 (Min, Max)

(28, 74)

(32,81)

 

(22,70)

(18,78)

 

SABAS Score Quartiles

 18–36

25 (8)

7 (2)

***

41 (13)

190 (45)

***

 37–53

170 (56)

183 (43)

 

179 (55)

151 (36)

 

 54–71

108 (35)

224 (53)

 

105 (32)

79 (19)

 

 72–90

2 (1)

10 (2)

 

0 (0)

5 (1)

 

Missing (1 or more questions missing from scale)

44

6

 

26

0

 

Negative Stereotyping SABAS Subscale2,3

 Mean (SD)

25.7 (5)

27 (4)

***

25.2 (5)

20.2 (8)

***

 Median

26

28

 

26

21

 

 (Min, Max)

(13,40)

(14,39)

 

(10,36)

(8,38)

 

Exclusion and Discrimination SABAS Subscale2,4

 Mean (SD)

17.1 (5)

20.2 (5)

***

15.7 (5)

13.5 (5)

***

 Median

16

20

 

15

13

 

 (Min, Max)

(8, 28)

(11, 32)

 

(7, 28)

(7, 30)

 

Fear of Contagion SABAS Subscale2,5

 Mean (SD)

7 (2)

7.8 (2)

***

7.7 (2)

5.7 (3)

***

 Median

8

8

 

8

5

 

 (Min, Max)

(3, 12)

(3, 14)

 

(3, 12)

(3, 14)

 
  1. 1Result of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (SABAS scores) or Chi-square test. Fisher’s exact used for expected cell counts < 5. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; NS = p-value is not significant at < 0.05 level
  2. 2Limited to those who answered all questions in the scale or subscale, respectively
  3. 3The Negative Stereotyping subscale contains 8 items, with possible score ranging from 8 to 40 points
  4. 4The Exclusion and Discrimination subscale contains 7 items, with possible score ranging from 7 to 35 points
  5. 5The Fear of Contagion subscale contains 3 items, with possible score ranging from 3 to 15 points