Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The value of endocervical curettage during large loop excision of the transformation zone in combination with endocervical surgical margin in predicting persistent/recurrent dysplasia of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study

Original Submission
1 Jul 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Anne Cathrine Scherer-Quenzer
8 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Anne Cathrine Scherer-Quenzer
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Volkan Karatasli
18 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrej Cokan
21 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Basilio Pecorino
29 Jul 2024 Author responded Author comments - Anne Cathrine Scherer-Quenzer
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jul 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrej Cokan
30 Jul 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Aug 2024 Editorially accepted
21 Aug 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12905-024-03291-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page