Peer Review reports
From: Women's experience of colposcopy: a qualitative investigation
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence von Karsa |
| 8 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - K A Galaal |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dawn Swancutt |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 14 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dawn Swancutt |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dawn Swancutt |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dawn Swancutt |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.