Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Shapley |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sioban Harlow |
| 16 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - cyrille huchon |
| 3 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ina Santos |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Shapley |
| 5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - cyrille huchon |
| 6 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sioban Harlow |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ina Santos |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ina Santos |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ina Santos |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 3 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.