Peer Review reports
From: Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Oakley |
| 6 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tessa Madden |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 11 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Oakley |
| 11 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tessa Madden |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 12 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Maria Godfrey |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.