Skip to main content

Table 5 Factors associated with screening mammography in logistic regression analysis

From: Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study

 

Crude Odds Ratio

OR (95% CI)

Adjusted Odds Ratio

OR (95% CI)a

Scale dimensions

  

   Susceptibilility

0.88 (0.69-1.13)

0.84 (0.63-1.14)

   Benefits

1.13 (0.88-1.46)

1.18 (0.86-1.60)c

   Barriers

0.29 (0.21-0.41)

0.28 (0.19-0.43)

Age

  

   40 to 50 yearsb

 

--

   50 to 60 years

1.60 (0.96-2.70)

2.35 (1.19-4.65)

   60 to 65 years

0.97 (0.43-2.15)

0.91 (0.33-2.46)

Formal education

  

   None/elementary schoolb

 

--

   High school

2.07 (1.12-3.80)

1.31 (0.59-2.87)

   University education

2.38 (1.17-4.81)

0.91 (0.34-2.43)

Region of birth

  

   Coastb

 

--

   Highlands

0.70 (0.43-1.15)

1.31(0.66-2.60)

   Jungle

0.71 (0.21-2.49)

0.53(0.11-2.54)

Region of current residence

  

   Coastb

 

--

   Highlands

0.59 (0.15-1.92)

0.36(0.08-1.67)

   Jungled

 

--

Knowledge

  

   Lower tercileb

 

--

   Middle tercile

2.46 (1.4-4.33)

2.18(1.09-4.39)c

   Upper tercile

3.28 (1.70-6.32)

2.55(1.14-2.73)c

Self breast exam

1.59 (0.92-2.75)

0.88(0.43-1.80)

Papanicolaou test

2.96 (1.67-5.23)

3.69(1.84-7.40)c

Data collection methodology

  

Self-administeredb

 

--

Direct interview

0.78 (0.48-1.26)

0.94(0.47-1.88)

  1. a Odds ratio (OR) adjusted by all the other variables in the model.
  2. b Reference category.
  3. c Statistically significant association.
  4. d Dropped from the model, only one participant was living in Jungle region.