Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vanessa Johnston |
26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Annette Schultz |
22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vanessa Johnston |
27 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Annette Schultz |
1 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
7 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Annette Schultz |
29 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Megan Passey |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
9 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-11-55 |
You can find further information about peer review here.