Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sandhya Pruthi |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Taplin |
| 13 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Smith |
| 10 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sandhya Pruthi |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 17 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Taplin |
| 3 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sandhya Pruthi |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Taplin |
| 23 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sandhya Pruthi |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Taplin |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-12-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.