Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamella Palma |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aase Sagen |
24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Electra Paskett |
20 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamella Palma |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aase Sagen |
13 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Electra Paskett |
6 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamella Palma |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aase Sagen |
9 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamella Palma |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamella Palma |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
31 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-13-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.