Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Analysis of three strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in the general population of women aged 60 to 70 years: the CRICERVA study

Original Submission
29 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
26 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Gardner
10 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
22 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Crespi
27 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 7
27 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
18 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 8
25 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 9
25 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 9
27 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 10
27 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 10
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amelia Acera
Resubmission - Version 11
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
9 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
16 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-14-86

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page