Peer Review reports
From: Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sep 2001 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 15 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hatem Mousa |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 17 Dec 2001 | Author responded | Author comments - Eric Scott Sills |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Dec 2001 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 8 Jan 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Eric Scott Sills |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 8 Jan 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| 15 Jan 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Eric Scott Sills |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 15 Jan 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Jan 2002 | Editorially accepted | |
| 17 Jan 2002 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6874-2-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.