Skip to main content

Table 2 Group characteristics

From: Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function

 

SCH (n = 33)

TAH (n = 27)

Significance

Age (mean, +/- SD)

45+/-5.0

46+/-4.8

NS*

Race

   

   white

21(64)

16(59)

 

   black

6(18)

6(22)

NS

   hispanic

3(9)

5(19)

 

   asian

3(9)

0

 

Marital status

   

   married

19(58)

19 (70)

 

   single

8(24)

6(23)

NS

   divorced

6(18)

2(7)

 

Length of stay (days)

(mean, +/- SD)

4.3+/-1.5

4.7+/-1.8

NS*

Uterine mass (grams)

(mean, +/- SD)

665+/-766

400+/-273

NS*

Indications

   

   leiomyoma

26(79)

16(60)

 

   menometrorhagia

3(9)

6(22)

NS

   cyst

3(9)

3(11)

 

   other

1 (3)

2 (7)

 

Incision type

   

   pfannensteil

25 (76)

23(85)

NS

   vertical

8(24)

4(15)

 

Previous abdominal surgery

   

   yes

17 (52)

10(37)

NS

   no

16(48)

17(63)

 

Parity

   

   parous

25 (76)

20(74)

NS

   nonparous

8(14)

7(16)

 

Same partner

   

   yes

27(84)

19 (79)

NS

   no

5(16)

5(21)

 

Oophorectomy

   

   yes

10(30)

17(63)

p < 0.05

   no

23(70)

10(37)

 

Hormone replacement

   

   yes

12(36)

16(59)

NS

   no

21 (64)

11 (41)

 
  1. Data are presented as n (%); NS = not significant; chi square test; NS* students t test