Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse: a population-based, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patient perceptions of results including sexual activity, urinary symptoms, and provided care

Original Submission
17 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Pauls
10 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Jelovsek
13 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farr Nezhat
23 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mojgan Pakbaz
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Farr Nezhat
26 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Jelovsek
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mojgan Pakbaz
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mojgan Pakbaz
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-9-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us