Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the groups (SWETZ × LLETZ-cone): surgical outcomes (IFF/Fiocruz - 2008–2011)

From: A comparison between type 3 excision of the transformation zone by straight wire excision of the transformation zone (SWETZ) and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a randomized study

 

SWETZ

%, range or SD*

LLETZ-cone

%, range or SD*

ARR (95% CI)

RR (95% CI)

p-value

N

78

100

76

100

-

-

-

Blood loss (ml)

 <20

74

94.9

76

100

-

-

 

 20-100

4

5.1

0

0

−5.1 (−10.0 – -0.2)

-

0.1

Number of segments removed

 1

77

100

59

78.7

19.8 (10.3-29.3)

-

-

 >1

0

0

16

21.3

-

-

<0,01

 No data

1

-

1

-

 

-

-

Surgery time - minutes (median)

20

8-60

17

9-32

-

-

<0,01§

 ≤18 min

33

42.9

44

60.3

-

-

-

 >18 min

44

57.1

29

39.7

−16.3 (−32,2 – -0.4)

1.44 (1.02-2.03)

 

 No data

1

-

5

-

-

-

-

Geometric ambition - mm (average)

30.92

6.31

30.54

6.15

-

-

0,7||

Geometric ambition difference - mm (average)¶**

10.19

5.7

10.62

5.5

-

-

0,7||

Anesthetic volume – ml

8.26

1.95

8.04

1.8

-

-

0,5||

 No data

11

-

15

-

-

-

-

Complications

2‡‡

2.6

2††

3

0.1 (−5.0-5.1)

0.97 (0.14-6.74)

1

  1. *Cases with no data were excluded.
  2. Fisher's Exact test.
  3. Chi-square.
  4. §Mann–Whitney test.
  5. ||Student's t-test.
  6. The ones unfilled of ambition or without histological measure were excluded.
  7. **Difference between the desired extension (endo + ecto) and what was effectively measured in the specimen.
  8. ††Opening of the vaginal mucosa and the need for anesthetic supplementation.
  9. ‡‡Opening of the lateral vaginal cul-de-sac with vascular injury, requiring total hysterectomy and need for general anesthesia.