Table 2 Satisfaction survey results: percentage of women who positively endorsed* acceptability items by wearable sensor
From: Feasibility of three wearable sensors for 24 hour monitoring in middle-aged women
Actigraph GT3X+ | GENEActiv | SenseWear Mini | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | (%) | N | (%) | N | (%) | |
N | 21 | 19 | 20 | |||
Device acceptability | ||||||
Easy to wear | 9 | (42.90) | 18 | (94.70) | 18 | (90.00) |
Placement | 10 | (47.6) | 13 | (68.4) | 16 | (80.0) |
Comfortable during sleep | 14 | (66.7) | 15 | (78.9) | 17 | (85.0) |
7 Days too long | 7 | (35.0) | 6 | (31.6) | 8 | (45.0) |
24 h each day too long | 8 | (38.1) | 7 | (36.8) | 8 | (45.0) |
Log was inconvenient | 4 | (21.1) | 5 | (26.3) | 6 | (30.0) |
Behavioral feedback content | ||||||
Moderate-vigorous physical activity feedback | 21 | (100.0) | 15 | (83.3) | 20 | (100.0) |
Light intensity activity feedback | 18 | (90.0) | 15 | (88.2) | 17 | (85.0) |
Sedentary activity feedback | 17 | (85.0) | 15 | (83.3) | 18 | (90.0) |
Sleep quantity/quality feedback | 19 | (100.0) | 16 | (100.0) | 16 | (84.2) |