Skip to main content

Table 2 Perception of cervical cancer and Practice of its screening

From: Effects of peer health education on perception and practice of screening for cervical cancer among urban residential women in south-east Nigeria: a before and after study

Perception variables

Pre-intervention (N = 285); n (%)

Post-intervention (N = 283); n (%)

p-value

Perception of severity

 Not severe

153 (53.7)

0

-

 As serious as other cancers

131 (45.9)

219 (77.4)

<0.001

 Less severe than other cancers

1 (0.4)

64 (22.6)

<0.001

Individual risk perception

 At risk

74 (26)

113 (40)

0.01

 Not at risk

211 (74)

170 (60)

0.01

Perception of benefit of screening

 Not beneficial

98 (34.4)

33 (11.7)

0.001

 Highly beneficial

145 (50.9)

195(68.9)

0.01

 Slightly beneficial

42 (14.7)

55 (19.4)

0.17

Willing to screen for cervical cancer

226 (79.3)

228 (80.8)

0.52

Screened for cervical cancer

30 (10.5)

49 (17.3)

0.02

 • Screening method

    Pap smear test

27 (9.5)

45 (15.9)

0.02

    Others (VILI and VIA)

3 (1.0)

4 (1.4)

0.69

Reasons for not screening

15 (5.3)

  

Fear of positive result

 

40 (14.1)

<0.001

Do not have symptoms

85 (29.9)

104 (36.7)

0.07

Cost of screening

12 (4.3)

24 (8.5)

0.06

Distance of screening center

37 (13)

46 (16.2)

0.3

Fear of pain

9 (3.2)

0 (0)

0.001

Don’t know screening tests

118 (41.4)

0 (0)

0.001

Don’t know where to screen

-

81 (28.6)

0.001