Table 3 Association between program individual components and the number of new acceptors and the number of FP users per reproductive health staff member, MLE facility survey

Kenya: number of facilities in panel sample^a

  Participation in contraceptive method redistribution

9–179

30–380

  Whole site FP training led by URHI

12–124

18–247

  URHI supported community health workers

13–129

50–287

  Any FP informational/educational materials observed

−84 – 121

−280 – 169

  URHI supported outreach programs

6–122

−6 – 239

  Any staff received URHI training on FP commodity management

33–135

16–222

  URHI visits by clinical teams to provide long acting or permanent methods.

45–135

40–231

Nigeria: number of facilities in panel sample^a

  Any provider received URHI training

30–89

31–135

  Any provider received a URHI monitoring visit

15–65

43–128

  Any provider was a member of the URHI FP Provider Network

20–81

68–171

  URHI sponsored renovation

16–66

26–113

No stock-outs of contraceptive methods in the last month

4–70

10–124

  Any FP informational/educational materials observed

7–97

10–157

Senegal: number of facilities in panel sample^a

  Any providers who received in-service FP training

−7 – 59

−53 – 199

  URHI sponsored midwife

6–85

−100 – 256

  URHI Informed Push Model

5–35

−32 – 92

  Facility-based URHI FP education programs

0–35

−4 – 135

  Any provider received training with the Systematic Identification of Client Needs tool.

1–33

−70 – 59

  Any FP informational/educational materials observed

−7 - 4

−30 - 16