Peer Review reports
From: ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Jan 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Birgitta Essén |
29 May 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Virginia Braun |
6 Jun 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Verina Wild |
8 Sep 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Els Leye |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Sep 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Verina Wild |
4 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amr Mahran |
14 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ahmed A Nassr |
19 Mar 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Els Leye |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Mar 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 May 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Els Leye |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 May 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Els Leye |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
6 Jun 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jun 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.