Table 2 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with having at least one HR-HPV DNA test among women who sought cervical care through NJCEED, 2009–2015
| Â | Proportion that ever had a HR-HPV DNA test (%) | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Age at enrollment into NJCEED (years) | |||
 29–39 | 30.8 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 40–49 | 28.5 | 0.89 (0.84–0.95) | 0.83 (0.78–0.88) |
  ≥ 50 | 23.5 | 0.69 (0.65–0.73) | 0.63 (0.59–0.67) |
Race/ethnicity | |||
 Non-Hispanic White | 21.8 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Non-Hispanic Black | 25.8 | 1.25 (1.17–1.33) | 1.38 (1.28–1.49) |
 Asian/Pacific Islander | 31.6 | 1.66 (1.52–1.80) | 1.23 (1.03–1.46) |
 Hispanic | 28.4 | 1.42 (1.35–1.50) | 1.54 (1.43–1.66) |
Place of birth | |||
 USA | 23.6 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Central and South America | 27.3 | 1.21 (1.15–1.27) | 0.86 (0.80–0.92) |
 Caribbean | 27.6 | 1.23 (1.16–1.31) | 0.91 (0.84–0.98) |
 Africa | 25.5 | 1.11 (0.95–1.31) | 1.00 (0.85–1.17) |
 Asia and the Middle East | 32.7 | 1.57 (1.45–1.71) | 1.61 (1.35–1.91) |
 Europe, Russia and Australia and Oceania | 35.3 | 1.76 (1.58–1.97) | 2.18 (1.94–2.45) |
 Other countriesa | 22.7 | 0.95 (0.85–1.05) | 0.95 (0.85–1.06) |
Number of cervical screening visits | |||
 1 | 22.7 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 2 | 31.5 | 1.56 (1.48–1.64) | 1.60 (1.52–1.69) |
  ≥ 3 | 43.1 | 2.58 (2.43–2.73) | 2.77 (2.61–2.94) |
Proportion of residents in ZCTA who are below the FPL | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–6.9%) | 27.2 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Quintile 2 (7.0–10.8%) | 23.3 | 0.79 (0.74–0.85) | 0.79 (0.74–0.85) |
 Quintile 3 (10.9–18.5%) | 23.7 | 0.81 (0.76–0.87) | 0.81 (0.76–0.87) |
 Quintile 4 (18.7–23.7%) | 21.9 | 0.73 (0.69–0.78) | 0.77 (0.72–0.82) |
 Quintile 5 (24.4–100.0%) | 35.9 | 1.47 (1.38–1.56) | 1.50 (1.41–1.61) |
Proportion of minority residents in ZCTA | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–26.6%) | 20.0 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (26.7–49.0%) | 24.2 | 1.27 (1.19–1.36) |  |
 Quintile 3 (50.4–76.4%) | 34.0 | 2.06 (1.93–2.19) |  |
 Quintile 4 (76.5–87.2%) | 21.4 | 1.09 (1.01–1.16) |  |
 Quintile 5 (87.8–98.8%) | 32.9 | 1.96 (1.84–2.09) |  |
Proportion of uninsured residents in ZCTA | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–13.0%) | 24.4 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (13.1–20.3%) | 22.8 | 0.91 (0.86–0.98) |  |
 Quintile 3 (20.4–28.8%) | 29.4 | 1.29 (1.21–1.37) |  |
 Quintile 4 (29.2–37.9%) | 26.3 | 1.11 (1.04–1.18) |  |
 Quintile 5 (38.1–100.0%) | 30.3 | 1.35 (1.27–1.43) |  |
Proportion of residents in ZCTA who don’t speak English very well | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–5.7%) | 19.0 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (5.8–11.3%) | 24.4 | 1.38 (1.29–1.47) |  |
 Quintile 3 (11.4–19.1%) | 29.6 | 1.79 (1.68–1.91) |  |
 Quintile 4 (19.2–34.3%) | 35.7 | 2.36 (2.21–2.52) |  |
 Quintile 5 (34.6–51.6%) | 24.8 | 1.41 (1.31–1.50) |  |