Skip to main content

Table 2 Participants’ Knowledge About Breast Cancer

From: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to breast cancer screening among female health care professionals: a cross sectional study

Questionnaire items for assessing knowledge about breast cancer

Frequency (%)a

95% CI b

Potential risk factors for developing breast cancer:

 R1: Increasing aged

18 (4.6)

2.5–6.6

 R2: Positive family historyd

7 (1.8)

0.5–3.1

 R3: High-fat dietd

58 (14.7)

11.2–18.2

 R4: Smokingd

36 (9.1)

6.3–12.0

 R5: Race/ethnicityd

51 (12.9)

9.6–16.2

 R6: Working class womend

74 (18.7)

14.9–22.6

 R7: Alcohol consumptiond

62 (15.7)

12.1–19.3

 R8: First child at late aged

92 (23.3)

19.1.0–27.5

 R9: Early onset of menarched

101 (25.6)

21.2–29.9

 R10: Late menopaused

103 (26.1)

21.7–30.4

 R11: Stressd

46 (11.6)

8.5–14.8

 R12: Obesityd

57 (14.4)

10.9–17.9

 R13: Larger breastd

94 (23.8)

19.6–28.0

Sign and symptoms which you think are related to breast cancer:

 SS1: Lump in the breastd

7 (1.8)

0.5–3.1

 SS2: Discharge from the beastd

6 (1.5)

0.3–2.7

 SS3: Pain or soreness in the breastd

7 (1.8)

0.5–3.1

 SS4: Change in the size of the breastd

13 (3.3)

1.5–5.1

 SS5: Discoloration /dimpling of the breastd

7 (1.8)

0.5–3.1

 SS6: Ulceration of the breastd

15 (3.8)

1.9–5.7

 SS7: Weight lossd

40 (10.1)

7.1–13.1

 SS8: Changes in the shape of the breastd

16 (4.1)

2.1–6.0

 SS9: Inversion/pulling in of nippled

35 (8.9)

6.0–11.8

 SS10: Swelling or enlargement of the breastd

16 (4.1)

2.1–6.0

 SS11: Lump under armpitd

18 (4.6)

2.7–8.4

 SS12: Scaling/dry skin in nipple regiond

49 (12.4)

9.1–15.7

Methods of diagnosis:

 M1: Pathological examination of breast tissue by using FNAC (Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology)d

32 (8.1)

5.4–10.8

 M2: Self-Breast Examinationd

6 (1.5)

0.3–2.7

 M3: CBE by doctord

4 (1.0)

0.0–2.0

 M4: Mammographyd

3 (0.8)

0.0–1.6

 M5: Ultrasoundd

21 (5.3)

3.1–7.5

Median (IQR) total score (TSd) for the knowledge scalec

1 (0–5)

 

Level of knowledge based on the total score:

 Poor (Score of 0–4)

281 (71.1)

 

 Fair (Score of 5–14)

104 (26.3)

 

 Good (Score of 15–30)

5 (1.3)

 
  1. aFrequencies and percentage (%) for the “yes” responses, % are computed with missing observations included in the denominator
  2. b95% Confidence intervals in column 3 for the percentages (%) in column 2
  3. cResponses to each item described in column 1 were recoded as (Yes = 1, No or don’t know = 0) and the total score (0–30) for the knowledge scale was computed, the median total score (interquartile range-IQR) was presented in the table
  4. dData is missing in R1 for (8 participants), R2 (7), R3 (18), R4 (13), R5 (15), R6 (22), R7 (13), R8 (17), R9 (21), R10 (18), R11 (12), R12 (27), R13 (17); SS1 (8), SS2 (11), SS3 (12), SS4 (9), SS5 (9), SS6 (11), SS7 (13), SS8 (14), SS9 (12), SS10 (9), SS11 (9), SS12 (16); M1 (10), M2 (8), M3 (9), M4 (7), M5 (9); TS (5)