Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Understanding what impacts on disclosing anal incontinence for women when comparing bowel-screening tools: a phenomenological study

Original Submission
12 Jun 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Ross
19 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Desseauve
6 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Krzysztof NOWOSIELSKY
8 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aliya Naz
4 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Julie Tucker
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Desseauve
13 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aliya Naz
29 Sep 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Krzysztof NOWOSIELSKY
7 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Julie Tucker
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aliya Naz
27 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Krzysztof NOWOSIELSKY
6 Nov 2019 Author responded Author comments - Julie Tucker
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Nov 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Nov 2019 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12905-019-0840-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page