Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Psychiatric, cognitive functioning and socio-cultural views of menstrual psychosis in Oman: an idiographic approach

Original Submission
3 Sep 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2019 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Oct 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Feb 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Gurvich
28 Feb 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dorota Raczkiewicz
31 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Mar 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Apr 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Gurvich
1 Jul 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jul 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 7
16 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 8
16 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 8
20 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 9
20 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 9
26 Aug 2020 Author responded Author comments - Nasser Al-Sibani
Resubmission - Version 10
26 Aug 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
30 Aug 2020 Editorially accepted
29 Sep 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12905-020-01060-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page