Peer Review reports
From: Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a survey of female gynecologists (POP-UP survey)
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 May 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 14 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Sep 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Urdzík |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Sep 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 30 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Oct 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Urdzík |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Oct 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 16 Oct 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Peter Urdzík |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 16 Oct 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Oct 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Oct 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12905-020-01105-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.