Skip to main content

Table 3 Predictors of change in Prolapse-Quality of Life score using a linear mixed effect model, University of Gondar Hospital, Ethiopia, 2019

From: Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and health-related quality of life: a follow-up study

Parameter

Estimate

SE

p value

95% confidence intervals

Lower bound

Upper bound

Results for physical component (PC) of P-QoL

 Intercept

− 66.62

17.34

< 0.001

− 100.63

− 32.62

 Marital status

2.55

1.58

0.10

− 0.55

5.65

 POP-SS

6.95

1.36

< 0.001

4.28

9.62

 PHQ

4.70

1.20

< 0.001

2.33

7.07

 BIPOP

3.89

0.60

< 0.001

2.70

5.08

 Time

23.06

5.28

< 0.001

12.70

33.41

Results for psychological component (PSC) of P-QoL

 Intercept

− 50.35

26.89

0.06

− 103.07

2.36

 Marital status

2.56

2.32

0.27

− 1.99

7.13

 POP-SS

5.54

2.11

< 0.01

1.39

9.68

 PHQ

4.42

1.86

0.01

0.77

8.07

 BIPOP

3.51

0.93

< 0.001

1.69

5.34

 Time

14.55

8.06

0.07

− 1.28

30.34

Results for personnel component (PRC) of P-QoL

 Intercept

− 159.38

22.09

< 0.001

− 202.69

− 116.07

 Marital status

5.80

1.97

< 0.01

1.93

9.66

 POP-SS

12.94

1.70

< 0.001

9.60

16.28

 PHQ

5.95

1.53

< 0.01

2.94

8.96

 BIPOP

5.69

0.76

< 0.001

4.18

7.19

 Time

60.70

6.83

< 0.001

47.29

74.10

  1. SE standard error, BIPOP body image in pelvic organ prolapse, P-QoL prolapse-quality of life, GHP general health perception, PI prolapse impact, RL role limitation, PL physical limitation, SL social limitation, PR personal relationships, EMO emotional disturbances, SE sleep/energy, SM severity measures, PC physical component, PSC psychological component, PRC personal relationship component, POP-SS pelvic organ prolapse symptom score, PHQ patient health questionnaire, PRO patient-reported outcome