Peer Review reports
From: Clinical relevance of routine transvaginal ultrasound in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Lone Pedersen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Apr 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 20 Apr 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jun 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 11 Aug 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Lone Pedersen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Aug 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 7 Sep 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 13 Dec 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Lone Pedersen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Dec 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 18 Dec 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 27 Dec 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Lone Pedersen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Dec 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 3 Jan 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Lone Pedersen |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 3 Jan 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Jan 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Jan 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12905-021-01173-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.