Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of characteristics between POP-Q users and nonusers

From: Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists

Variable

POP-Q users (n = 61)

Nonusers (n = 65)

P value*

Age, year

48.1 ± 9.5

47.6 ± 9.2

0.765

Sex

  

0.031

 Male

36 (59.0)

50 (76.9)

 Female

25 (41.0)

15 (23.1)

Subspecialty

  

0.006

 Urogynecology

21 (34.4)

9 (13.8)

 Others

40 (65.6)

56 (86.2)

Fellowship for prolapse surgery

  

0.524

 No

50 (82.0)

56 (86.2)

 Yes

11 (18.0)

9 (13.8)

Years of experience in clinical practice

  

0.966

 5

18 (29.5)

16 (24.6)

 6–10

12 (19.7)

15 (23.1)

 11–15

13 (21.3)

13 (20.0)

 16–20

9 (14.8)

11 (16.9)

 > 20

9 (14.8)

10 (15.4)

Surgical volume, number of cases/year

  

0.009

  20

35 (57.4)

39 (60.0)

 21–50

12 (19.7)

23 (35.4)

 51–100

9 (14.8)

3 (4.6)

 > 100

5 (8.2)

0

  1. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%)
  2. POP-Q, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification
  3. *Calculated from the two-sample t-test for continuous variables or chi-squared test for categorical variables