Skip to main content

Table 1 Study population qualitative method

From: Men’s reproductive coercion of women: prevalence, experiences, and coping strategies—a mixed method study in urban health facilities in León, Nicaragua

Informant

Age range

Occupation

Education

Number of children

Marital status

Reproductive coercion experienced

Informant no 1

20–25

Unemployed

College education

2

Single

Forced sexual relations; pregnancy promotion; contraceptive sabotage; manipulation

Informant no 2

26–30

Housewife

College education

1

Married

Control as care; violating integrity; pregnancy promotion

Informant no 3

20–25

Employed

Primary school

3

Single

Forced sexual relations; pregnancy promotion; contraceptive sabotage; undermining woman’s self-efficacy; shaming/humiliation

Informant no 4

20–25

Employed

College education

0

Partner, not living together

Threat; pregnancy promotion; manipulation

Informant no 5

26–30

Housewife

Primary school

2

Married

Control as an expression of care

Informant no 6

20–25

Housewife

College education

1

Married

Pregnancy promotion; forced sexual relation; shaming/humiliation

Informant no 7

20–25

Employed

College education

1

Partner, not living together

Withholding information