Skip to main content

Table 2 Compare HPV infection and TCT with pathological diagnosis

From: The prevalence of human papillomavirus and bacterial vaginosis among young women in China: a cross-sectional study

Cytology

 

Histological diagnosis

P

NILM

CIN1

CIN2

Total (n = 1842)

HPV( +) (n = 193)

129(7.00%)

56(3.04%)

8(0.43%)

 < 0.001

HPV( −) (n = 1649)

1646(89.36%)

3(0.16%)

0(0.00%)

Clue cells( +) (n = 75)

67(3.64%)

6(0.33%)

2(0.11%)

0.004

Clue cells( −) (n = 1767)

1708(92.73%)

53(2.88%)

6(0.33%)

Normal (NILM)(n = 1774)

HPV( −) (n = 1630)

1630(91.88%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

Ref

LR-HPV( +) (n = 16)

15(0.85%)

1(0.06%)

0(0.00%)

0.01

HR-HPV( +) (n = 116)

80(4.51%)

35(1.97%)

1(0.06%)

 < 0.001

Mix-HPV( +) (n = 12)

8(0.45%)

4(0.23%)

0(0.00%)

 < 0.001

Abonormal (≥ ASC-US) (n = 68)

HPV( −) (n = 19)

16(23.53%)

3(4.41%)

0(0.00%)

Ref

LR-HPV( +) (n = 3)

3(4.41%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

 > 0.999

HR-HPV( +) (n = 41)

20(29.41%)

15(22.06%)

6(8.82%)

0.03

Mix-HPV( +) (n = 5)

3(4.41%)

1(1.47%)

1(1.47%)

0.23

  1. Clue cells > 20% was positive; ≥ ASCUS, including ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL and AGC. P value was obtained from Fisher's exact test. LR-HPV positive was LR-HPV positive only. HR-HPV positive was HR-HPV positive only. Mix-HPV positive was both LR-HPV positive and HR-HPV positive. HPV positive were mix-HPV positive, LR-HPV positive and HR-HPV positive. CIN cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV human papillomavirus, NILM negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, TCT thinprep cytologic test
Back to article page

BMC Women's Health

ISSN: 1472-6874

Contact us