Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Three-year observational study of immediate post-abortion insertion versus menstrual insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implant

Original Submission
5 Mar 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
25 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Jul 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mariane Nunes de Nadai
27 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Lili Huang
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Lili Huang
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mariane Nunes de Nadai
2 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Lili Huang
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Lili Huang
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mariane Nunes de Nadai
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Nov 2021 Editorially accepted
29 Dec 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12905-021-01542-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page