Skip to main content

Table 1 Relationship between participants’ characteristics and cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive women attending an Urban HIV care Clinic in Uganda (n = 205)

From: Cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive women in urban Uganda: a cross sectional study

Variable (n = 205)

n (%)

Ever screening for cervical cancer

Yes n (%)

No n (%)

χ2 P value

Age in years (µ = 37.5 ± 8.87)

  ≤ 36

105 (51.2)

37 (35.2)

68 (64.8)

6.56 (0.010)

  > 36

100 (48.8)

53 (53.0)

47 (47.0)

Marital status

 Single/never married

13 (6.3)

3 (23.1)

10 76.9)

2.44 (0.295)

 Married/cohabiting

75 (36.6)

34 (45.3)

41 (54.7)

 Separated /widowed

117 (57.1)

53 (45.3)

64 (54.7)

Parity (µ = 3.9 ± 2.2)

  ≤ 4

138 (67.3)

56 (40.6)

82 (59.4)

0.90 (0.169)

  > 4

33 (32.7)

34 (50.8)

33 (49.2)

Level of education

 Uneducated/primary level

119 (58.1)

61(51.3)

58 (48.7)

6.37 (0.041)

 Secondary level

63 (30.7)

22 (34.9)

41 (65.1)

 Tertiary level

23 (11.2)

07 (30.4)

16 (69.6)

Employment status

 Employed

125 (41.0)

55 (44.0)

70 (56.0)

0.01(0.972)

 Unemployed

80 (39.0)

35 (43.8)

45 (56.2)

Age at first sexual intercourse (µ = 16.4 ± 2.5)

  ≤ 16

115 (56.1)

58 (50.4)

57 (49.6)

4.54 (0.033)

  > 16

90 (43.9)

32 (35.6)

58 (64.4)

History of contraceptive use

 Yes

139 (67.8)

57 (41.0)

82 (59.0)

1.47 (0.225)

 No

66 (32.2)

33 (43.9)

115 (56.1)

Awareness of cervical cancer

 Yes

201 (98.0)

90 (44.8)

111 (52.2)

3.19 (0.074)

 No

4 (2.0)

00 (0.0)

4 (100.0)

Awareness of cervical cancer screening

 Yes

201 (98.0)

89 (44.3)

112 (55.7)

0.59 (0.442)

 No

4 (2.0)

01 (25.0)

03 (75.0)

Source of information (n = 201)

 Health professional ara>

154 (75.1)

81 (52.6)

73 9 (47.4

19.00 (< 0.001)

 Media/friends/relatives

51 (24.9)

09 (17.7)

42 (82.3)

Knowledge of a cervical cancer screening facility

 Yes

91 (44.4)

43 (47.3)

48 (52.8)

0.75 (0.390)

 No

114 (55.6)

47 (41.2)

67 (58.8)

Cost of cervical cancer screening service (n = 91)

 Free

51 (56.0)

27 (52.9)

24 (47.1)

1.50 (0.220)

 Not free

40 (44.0)

16 (40.0)

24 (60.0)

Affordability of the screening service (n = 40)

 Affordable

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 Not affordable

40 (100%)

16 (40.0)

24 (60.0)