Peer Review reports
From: A comparison of behavioural models explaining cervical cancer screening uptake
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 16 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Mclaughlin |
| 9 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pooyan Afzali Harsini |
| 15 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Jyoshma Preema Dsouza |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Jyoshma Preema Dsouza |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 22 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 2 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pooyan Afzali Harsini |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 May 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Jun 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12905-022-01801-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.