Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted associations between types of contraceptives use and women with diabetes and/or hypertension

From: Pattern of contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women with diabetes and/or hypertension: findings from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey

Chronic conditions

Contraceptive methods

No use vs any methods use

Traditional methods or no use vs modern methods use

Traditional methods vs modern methods use

Unadjusted PR (95% CI) p value

Adjusted* PR (95% CI) p value

Unadjusted PR (95% CI) p value

Adjusted* PR (95% CI) p value

Unadjusted PR (95% CI) p value

Adjusted* PR (95% CI) p value

None

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Diabetes only

0.98 (0.76–1.23) p = 0.785

0.88 (0.67–1.15) p = 0.340

1.05 0(0.87–1.25) p = 0.625

0.95 (0.78–1.15) p = 0.568

1.27 (0.86–1.85) p = 0.225

1.08 (0.69–1.54) p = 0.685

Hypertension only

1.04 (0.91–1.18) p = 0.603

0.99 (0.84–1.15) p = 0.744

1.09 (0.99–1.21) p = 0.079

%1.%2(0.90–1.13) p = 0.991

1.30 (1.04–1.62) p = 0.021

1.04 (0.84–1.30) p = 0.706

Both diabetes and hypertension

1.20 (0.95–1.52) p = 0.122

%1.%2(0.75–1.36) p = 0.960

1.29 (1.08–1.53) p = 0.005

1.08 (0.88–1.34) p = 0.462

1.70 (1.14–2.52) p = 0.008

1.31 (1.02–2.01) p = 0.005

  1. PR = Prevalence ratio; CI = Confidence Interval
  2. *Models were adjusted for women’s age, education, body mass index, husbands’ education, wealth quintiles, number of children ever born, place of residence and administrative divisions