Skip to main content

Table 3 Multilevel logistic regression models for individual and household/community predictors of intimate partner violence in Nigeria

From: Spatial distribution and predictors of intimate partner violence among women in Nigeria

Variables

n = 8968

Model 0

Model I

Model II

Model III

aOR[95% CI]

aOR[95% CI]

aOR[95% CI]

Fixed effects results

Individual-level variables

    

 Age of respondent

    

  15–24

 

RC

 

RC

  25–34

 

1.05[0.90–1.22]

 

1.12[0.97–1.31]

  35 and above

 

0.79**[0.67–0.94]

 

0.89[0.74–1.06]

 Women’s level of education

    

  No education

 

RC

 

RC

  Primary

 

0.95[0.79–1.13]

 

0.99[0.84–1.19]

  Secondary and above

 

0.89[0.74–1.06]

 

1.05[0.87–1.27]

 Husband/Partner’s level of education

    

  No education

 

RC

 

RC

  Primary

 

1.27*[1.05–1.53]

 

1.32**[1.09–1.60]

  Secondary and above

 

0.93[0.79–1.11]

 

1.04[0.87–1.24]

 Marital status

    

  Currently married

 

RC

 

RC

  Cohabitating

 

1.13[0.87–1.48]

 

1.20[0.91–1.56]

  Previously married

 

1.72***[1.35–2.19]

 

1.73***[1.33–2.25]

 Working status

    

  No

 

RC

 

RC

  Yes

 

1.30***[1.14–1.47]

 

1.29***[1.14–1.47]

 Ethnicity

    

  Hausa

 

RC

 

RC

  Yoruba

 

0.70**[0.54–0.90]

 

1.39*[0.99–1.94]

  Igbo

 

1.09[0.83–1.43]

 

1.01[0.70–1.47]

  Others

 

1.52***[1.25–1.84]

 

1.10[0.89–1.37]

 Religion

    

  Christianity

 

RC

 

RC

  Islam

 

0.65***[0.54–0.90]

 

0.57***[0.47–0.69]

  Traditionalist and others

 

0.52*[0.28–0.96]

 

0.55*[0.30–1.01]

 Parity

    

  0

 

RC

 

RC

  1–3

 

1.49***[1.19–1.85]

 

1.47**[1.18–1.84]

  4 and above

 

1.89***[1.49–2.39]

 

1.78***[1.40–2.25]

 Exposure to mass media

    

  No

 

RC

 

RC

  Yes

 

0.99[0.87–1.12]

 

1.14*[1.00–1.31]

Household-level

    

Place of residence

    

 Urban

  

RC

RC

 Rural

  

0.88[0.74–1.05]

0.85[0.72–1.01]

Wealth index

    

 Poorest

  

RC

RC

 Poorer

  

0.82*[0.69–0.98]

0.78**[0.65–0.93]

 Middle

  

0.76**[0.62–0.92]

0.71**[0.58–0.87]

 Richer

  

0.65***[0.52–0.81]

0.61***[0.48–0.78]

 Richest

  

0.47***[0.36–0.62]

0.45***[0.34–0.61]

Region

    

 North Central

  

RC

RC

 North East

  

1.11[0.87–1.41]

1.50**[1.16–1.92]

 North West

  

0.31***[0.25–0.39]

0.49***[0.37–0.64]

 South East

  

0.94[0.73–1.21]

0.75[0.51–1.10]

 South South

  

1.27*[0.99–1.63]

1.01[0.78–1.31]

 South West

  

0.33***[0.25–0.42]

0.25***[0.18–0.34]

Sex of household head

    

 Male

  

RC

RC

 Female

  

1.18*[1.02–1.36]

1.01[0.86–1.20]

Community literacy level

    

 Low

  

RC

RC

 Medium

  

1.05[0.87–1.27]

0.89[0.73–1.09]

 High

  

1.04[0.82–1.33]

0.83[0.65–1.07]

Community socioeconomic status

    

 Low

  

RC

RC

 Medium

  

1.42*[1.03–1.96]

1.45*[1.06–2.00]

 High

  

0.92[0.73–1.15]

0.97[0.77–1.21]

Random effects results

 PSU Variance (95% CI)

1.23[1.06–1.44]

1.00[0.84–1.18]

0.84[0.71–1.01]

0.81[0.68–0.98]

 ICC

0.27

0.23

0.20

0.19

 LR test

χ2 = 658.59, p < 0.001

χ2 = 472.39, p < 0.001

χ2 = 369.95, p < 0.001

χ2 = 342.95, p < 0.001

 Wald χ2

Reference

237.68***

318.78***

450.12***

Model fitness

    

 Log-likelihood

− 5581.21

− 5461.92

− 5422.82

− 5348.14

 AIC

11,166.42

10,961.84

10,879.64

10,764.27

 Number of clusters

1383

1383

1383

1383

  1. Weighted NDHS, 2018
  2. Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets
  3. Model 0 is the null model, a baseline model without any determinant variable
  4. Model I is adjusted for individual-level variables (Age of respondent, women educational level, spouse educational level, marital status, currently working, ethnicity, religion, parity, and media exposure)
  5. Model II is adjusted for household/community level variables (Place of residence, wealth index, region, sex of household head, community literacy level, community socioeconomic status)
  6. Model III is the final model adjusted for individual and household/community level variables
  7. AOR, adjusted odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; RC, reference category; PSU, primary sampling unit; ICC, intra-class correlation; LR test, likelihood ratio test; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion
  8. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001