Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the endometrial thickness, pattern, and movement

From: Endometrial microstimulation effects on endometrial receptivity assessed by transvaginal color Doppler sonography

Item

Group A [the number of cases (%)]

Group B [the number of cases (%)]

Endometrial thickness (cm)

0.97 ± 0.18

0.95 ± 0.17

Endometrial pattern:Trilaminar pattern

24 (80.0%)*

35 (58.3%)

Homogeneous pattern

6 (20.0%)

25 (41.7%)

Endometrial blood flow: Type I

5 (16.7%)**

26 (43.3%)

Type II

19 (63.3%)

24 (40.0%)

Type III

6 (20.0%)

10 (16.7%)

Endometrial movement: Type 1

14 (46.7%)

31 (51.7%)

Type 2

9 (30.0%)

17 (28.3%)

Type 3

2 (6.7%)

3 (5.0%)

Type 5

5 (16.7%)

9 (15.0%)

  1. *Compare with group B, the difference was statistically significant, P = 0.041
  2. ** Compare with group B, the difference was statistically significant, P = 0.038