Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics of selected studies

From: Conservative non-pharmacological interventions in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Identification

Qualitative design

Sampling strategies

Number/ participants

Intervention

Tools

Analysis

Quality criteria reported

Abhyankar et al. [19]

Qualitative study—symbolic interactionism

Purposive sampling

22 women with POP receiving prolapse care

PFMT and/or pessaries

Semi-structured interviews and focus group

Thematic analysis

Ashworth et al. [34]

Phenomenological study

Unknown

28 women with UI and aged between 25 to 55 years old

PFMT

Non-structured and structured face-to-face interview

Analysis was guided by phenomenological principles, adapting from Giorgi

Asklund et al. [20]

Qualitative study

Purposive sampling

15 women with SUI and aged between 27 to 72 years old (mean age 47 years old)

PFMT

Semi-structured, telephone interview, guide with open-ended questions

Grounded theory

Bakker et al. [21]

Qualitative study

Purposive sampling

30 women who treaded with brachytherapy (mean age was 49 years old, aged between 32 to 67 years old)

Vaginal dilator

Semi-structured face-to- face or by telephone interview

The transcriptions were analysed with QSR International's Nvivo 10 software using the Framework Approach

Bjork et al. 2014

Qualitative study

Strategic selection

21 women with SUI aged between 30 to 69 years old

PFMT

Semi-structured interview by telephone

Grounded theory

Bonner et al. [31]

Qualitative study

Purposive sampling

15 women with an average age was 53 years old, aged between 31 to 68 years old

Vaginal dilators

Semi-structured face-to-face or by telephone interview

Thematic analysis

Cacchioni et al. [15]

Qualitative study

Unknown

31 women were interviewed but only 18 of those interviewed were presented (average age of was 36 years old, aged between 24 to 62 years old)

Hands-on intervention

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews

All interview and fieldwork data were transcribed and manually coded by theme with names and identity-revealing information changed

Delamerlindo et al. [13]

Grounded theory study

Purposive sampling

18 women aged between 41 to 81 years old

PFMT

Non-directive interview

Grounded theory

Delamerlindo et al. [14]

Qualitative study

Unknown

18 women with UI aged between 41 to 81 years old

PFMT

Non-directive interview

Grounded theory

Firet et al. [27]

Qualitative study

Purposive sampling

13 women with SUI aged between 40 to more than 80 years old

PFMT

Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews

Grounded theory and Atlas.ti software

The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research

Grant et al. [23]

Qualitative exploratory study

Unknown

31 postnatal women aged between 28 to 43 years old

PFMT

Online and face-to-face focus group

Thematic analysis

Hay-Smith et al. [32]

Unknown

Purposive sampling

20 women with aged between 23 to 86 years old

PFMT

Semi-structured face-to-face interviews

Descriptive content analysis

Hyland et al. 2013

Phenomenological study

Purposive sampling

5 women with POP aged between 45 to 60 years old

PFMT

Semi-structured face-to-face interviews

Interpretative phenomenological analysis

Kao et al. [29]

Qualitative descriptive study

Purposive sampling

12 women aged between 44 to 66 years old

PFMT

Semi-structured face-to-face in-depth interviews

Thematic analysis

Lincoln and Guba's guidelines: Credibility, Dependability, Confirmability and Transferability

Lindgren et al. [24]

Qualitative descriptive study

Unknown

13 women who survived gynaecological cancer, mean age of 66 years old (aged between 48 to 82 years old)

PFMT

Semi-structured interview

Content analysis

Macey et al. [25]

Qualitative study—phenomenological approach

Convenience sampling

13 women were interviewed aged between 20 to 67 years old

Vaginal dilators

Semi-structured interviews

Thematic analysis

Although the article did not present in writing the use of quality criteria, some could be identified during the reading

Mackenzie [26]

Phenomenological study

Phenomenological sampling

5 women

Perineal massage

Semi-structured, in-depth interviews

Colaizzi's data analysis framework

Verbatim quotes are utilised in reports of the findings to further enhance credibility, subjects were only invited to participate if they had had no prior contact with the researcher

Maldonado et al. [18]

Qualitative study

Unknown

29 Spanish-speaking women with symptoms of POP (aged between 40 to 79 years old, mean 50)

Pessaries

Semi-structured interview/in focus group

Grounded theory

Sevilla et al. [16]

Qualitative study

Unknown

16 Spanish-speaking women with a mean age of 67.6 (aged between 47 to 85) years old

Pessary

Semi-structured interviews

Grounded theory

Siu et al. [30]

Qualitative descriptive study

Purposive sample

35 women with SUI who aged between 39 to 74 years old with a mean age of 51.26

PFMT

Semi-structured face-to-face interviews

Content analysis

The rigour in qualitative research followed the techniques suggested by Tuckett

Storey et al. [17]

Interpretative narrative inquiry

Purposive sampling

11 women with UI and/or POP who were over 65 years old and retired and came from both rural and urban areas

Pessaries

Semi-structured face-to-face interviews

Narrative analysis

Trustworthiness, an audit trail of researcher field notes and reflexive texts, documenting decision-making, biases and analytical choices

Terry et al. [28]

Ethnographic approach

Unknown

15 pregnant women and 12 of these women postnatally

PFMT

Observations, interviews, field conversations, comprehensive field notes and semi-structured interviews

Thematic analysis

 
  1. SUI Stress Urinary Incontinence; UI Urinary Incontinence; PFMT Pelvic Floor Muscle Training; US United States; POP Pelvic Organ Prolapse