Table 5 Results from multiple logistic regression of abortion safety (most unsafe vs. other) on respondent characteristics and partner involvement
Nigeria (N = 1089)a | Côte d'Ivoire (N = 333) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p-value | |||
Partner involvement | ||||||||
No partner involvement | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
Any partner involvement | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.45 | < 0.001 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.47 | < 0.001 |
Age at abortion | ||||||||
10–19 | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
20–29 | 0.92 | 0.66 | 1.29 | 0.638 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 1.08 | 0.090 |
30 + | 1.42 | 0.95 | 2.13 | 0.083 | 1.42 | 0.59 | 3.41 | 0.429 |
Marital status at abortion | ||||||||
Not married | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
Married | 1.08 | 0.72 | 1.61 | 0.713 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 2.15 | 0.718 |
Residence at abortionb | ||||||||
Rural | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
Urban | 0.89 | 0.65 | 1.22 | 0.482 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.10 | 0.095 |
Highest level of school attendedc | ||||||||
None | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
Primary | 0.68 | 0.39 | 1.18 | 0.166 | 0.84 | 0.46 | 1.53 | 0.567 |
Secondary | 0.97 | 0.58 | 1.61 | 0.904 | 0.84 | 0.42 | 1.67 | 0.620 |
Higher | 0.76 | 0.43 | 1.35 | 0.355 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 4.15 | 0.858 |
Parity at abortion | ||||||||
0 | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
1 + | 0.77 | 0.52 | 1.14 | 0.192 | 1.46 | 0.78 | 2.74 | 0.240 |
Wealth tertile at interview | ||||||||
Low | ref | – | – | – | ref | – | – | – |
Middle | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.88 | 0.009 | 0.96 | 0.50 | 1.83 | 0.903 |
High | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.78 | 0.002 | 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.61 | 0.001 |
State at interview | ||||||||
Anambra | ref | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Kaduna | 0.80 | 0.49 | 1.30 | 0.370 | – | – | – | – |
Lagos | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 0.001 | – | – | – | – |
Nasarawa | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.73 | 0.001 | – | – | – | – |
Rivers | 0.58 | 0.39 | 0.88 | 0.009 | – | – | – | – |
Taraba | 0.63 | 0.33 | 1.21 | 0.167 | – | – | – | – |